Posted: Thursday, November 5, 2015
KELLOGG — A young male wolf made its home much of late spring and summer in farmland near Kellogg, said Mike Tenney, and "everybody thought it was kind of interesting."
When it killed two calves at the end of August, however, "it was the end of the love affair," said the area Department of Natural Resources wildlife supervisor.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service from Grand Rapids was called in, it trapped the wolf and it was euthanized, he said.
An official with the service said
that it might not be the last wolf in the region because wolves are
expanding west from Wisconsin more toward the coulee country along the
Upper Mississippi River. It's possible the southeast could eventually
have a full pack.
Tenney said the DNR started
getting reports about the wolf near Kellogg as early as April. The DNR
even had pictures from cell phones and other devices. He declined to say
exactly where because he doesn't want people calling landowners.
The wolf, a 2-year-old male,
stayed in the same area, which is unusual because wolves that do show up
in the region usually move through, he said.
When it killed calves, the
experts from Grand Rapids came down, and confirmed "the calves were
killed by a wolf or wolves," he said.
While no one can be sure where it
came from, the best bet is that it came from Wisconsin because
Wisconsin's established wolf packs are much closer to this area than
Minnesota's established wolf packs, which are up north. "It makes sense
that a wolf came across the (Mississippi) river," Tenney said. The wolf,
which weighed about 80 pounds, probably got kicked out of its pack and
began to roam around to find a new home, he said.
Wolves are found every now and
then in the region, including one killed trying to cross U.S. Highway 52
north of Rochester many years ago, he said.
John Hart, district supervisor
for the federal service in Grand Rapids, said that while this wolf was
not the first, it is different in one sense: "It's the first time we
have ever documented any wolf damage in Southeast Minnesota."
Experts found "the wounds on the
calf were consistent with what a wolf would do," Hart said. The tracks
were the right size, too.
It was killed for two reasons, Hart said.
First, "we really don't know
where to move them," he said. All the good wolf habitats in Minnesota
and Wisconsin "are full of wolves already."
Second, "no one wants a known
livestock killer," he said. Euthanizing such wolves has been a federal
policy for several decades and "that has been a real successful
approach," he said.
With packs moving closer to
Southeast Minnesota from Wisconsin, it could happen that this region
will have a pack, he said. The area has woods, valleys, deer and other
prey. "As long as you have deer to eat and enough cover," you could have
a pack, he said. In fact, habitat in this area is better than wolf
habitat in northwest Minnesota, Hart said.
"It's not a habitat issue," he said. "It's wolves getting there, settling down and not causing any issues."
source
source
Why call it "euthanization"? It's an execution. Were the calves guarded or left to fend for themselves? Do they know for sure that the wolf didn't feed on the calves after their died of other causes? Wisconsin isn't exactly a wolf-loving state.
ReplyDelete