This will be short and to the point... someone, please tell me how this makes sense:
We spend thousands of dollars to save a species from extinction only to turn around and hunt it again. Is that why we saved this species? So we could hunt them and trap them and sell their furs and disrupt their families? We restablish a keystone species so we could again, disrupt and harm the ecosystem?
So, how does this make sense?
No comments:
Post a Comment