|
|
Key Points:
1. Thanking the California Department of Fish and Wildlife
- We
appreciate the Department's hard work and approach to the process to
create a Wolf Conservation Plan for the state, including the opportunity
for varied interests to provide input through a transparent process.
- We
understand that it is a delicate process to create a plan that will
best conserve wolves, while considering the interest of those sharing
the landscape with this protected species.
2. Coexistence between wolves and the ranching community
- Promoting
coexistence between livestock producers and wolves is of critical
importance for successful wolf recovery in California and we are
especially grateful that that the Plan has a strong emphasis on the use
of proactive measures for protecting livestock and wolves. We ask that
the Department prioritize the following in order to ensure peaceful wolf
recovery:
- Secure funding specifically to create and
implement a program that will provide information and on-going support
on the use of proactive tools and strategies available for reducing
conflicts between livestock and wolves
- Expedite establishing Depredation Prevention Agreements with interested and willing livestock producers
- Set
up a fund to provide compensation for livestock depredations; this will
go a long way to promoting goodwill among the livestock community
critical to ensuring long-term wolf recovery
3. Management Phases and wolf population numbers
- The number of wolves required to transition from Phase I and Phase II are unacceptably low.
- In addition, we have the following concerns regarding the numbers proposed:
- They are not scientifically-based
- They have not been adequately justified by CDFW
- They don't allow a long enough transition period between the phases to ensure breeding pair numbers won't immediately decline
- The
shift from Phase II to Phase III should be left open until we know more
about how wolves do in California as they populate the California
landscape.
- Please
give wolves the best chance in California. We ask that you allow
sufficient time for non-lethal coexistence strategies to take hold in
our state and not rush the management phases.
Secondary Points:
1. Need for scientific studies
- There
are needed scientific studies in California that are critical to
responsibly conserving and managing wolves moving forward, including:
- population trend
- range and distribution
- abundance, and life history of a species
- factors affecting the ability of the population to survive and reproduce
- nonlethal strategies use and effectiveness
2. Missing pieces of the Plan
- While
the Draft Plan has a wide variety of critical provisions that will
guide the state's conservation and management of wolves into the future,
it is also missing some key information, including:
- Depredation Investigations Protocols
- List of proactive, nonlethal tools to reduce conflicts between livestock and wolves
- Both
Wolf-Livestock and Wolf-Ungulate Conflict Management Strategies, as
referenced in Phase 2. We request the opportunity to review those as
well
- The Livestock Depredation Protocol that is available on
the Department's wolf web page; this should also be contained within the
Plan with the understanding that it may evolve over time as we learn
more about how best to address wolf-livestock conflicts in California.
- List of "Priority Counties" for depredation compensation. We suggest Siskiyou, Modoc, Shasta and Lassen Counties
|
No comments:
Post a Comment