- Article by: DOUG SMITH , Star Tribune
- Updated: November 1, 2014
The jury is still out on climate change, but more wolves seems to correlate with a decline in moose population.
A days-old moose calf near Isabella,
Minn., was fitted with a radio collar. Researchers are trying to find
out what effect wolves are having on moose mortality.
Wolves
likely have played a bigger role in the decline of northeast
Minnesota’s moose population than originally believed, and there’s no
evidence yet that climate change has been a major factor, according to a
new analysis by renowned Minnesota wolf researcher Dave Mech.
Mech
doesn’t dismiss climate change as a possible factor in the declining
moose herd, but said evidence presented in earlier research done by the
Department of Natural Resources “just doesn’t hold up.”
Instead,
an increasing wolf population in at least part of the northeast moose
range might have contributed to the decline, Mech and John Fieberg, an
assistant professor at the University of Minnesota, concluded in a
recently published paper. The state’s northeast moose herd has fallen 50
percent since 2006, to an estimated 4,350 animals last winter.
In
the earlier studies, DNR researchers considered the statewide wolf
population stable between 2000 and 2010, which was correct, Mech said.
But they didn’t consider that the wolf population in an area that Mech
has been studying — which overlaps part of a moose study area — had
increased to the highest levels in 40 years.
“My
data tends to indicate the problem was there were more wolves,” Mech
said in an interview. “But that doesn’t necessarily mean that’s the only
answer. Is there some change affecting moose that allows wolves to take
more of them, or is it merely that there’s more wolves?”
If
wolves are a major factor in the moose decline, Mech said the DNR could
allow hunters to kill more wolves in the moose range until the
population recovers.
Michelle
Carstensen, DNR wildlife health program supervisor, who in 2013 began
conducting an adult moose mortality study using radio-collared animals,
said the previous DNR studies looked at overall mortality, but
researchers weren’t able to determine cause of death in most cases.
“We assumed wolves were accounting for a portion of that mortality, but we didn’t know how much,” she said.
But
now officials are finding how much impact wolves are having on moose
mortality. The study radio collars alert researchers when an animal has
died, and provide GPS coordinates so they can be quickly located and a
cause of death determined.
So
far in the study, the overall mortality rate is 26 percent, which is a
concern. Normal stable moose populations have an 8 to 12 percent
mortality rate. Wolves have accounted for 55 percent of the mortality
(17 of 31 deaths); the rest died from health issues.
“The
level of wolf predation on the adults is well in line with what we’d
expect,” Carstensen said. “It’s the overall mortality [from all causes]
that has us concerned.”
She
noted that the northwest moose heard plummeted from about 4,000 in the
’80s to fewer than 100 today, and wolves had nothing to do with that.
Those moose died from health-related issues, possibly driven by climate
changes.
And, she said, adult moose in the northeast keep dying in summer, fall and early winter “when they shouldn’t be dying.”
Carstensen
said the results from current ongoing moose studies, which also include
moose calves, habitat and diet, should eventually provide researchers
with answers to the mystery. “There still might not be a smoking gun; it
might be very complex,” she said.
So far, in a different study involving collared moose calves, 67 percent of the mortality was due to wolves.
“Wolf
predation is probably a little higher than we expected,” DNR researcher
Glenn DelGiudice said. “But we knew it would be a main source,” he
said, and it’s far too early to draw any conclusions.
He is planning on collaring more moose calves next spring, and said several years of data are needed.
Mech’s
latest report says the northeast moose population was relatively
unaffected by wolves from 1997 to about 2003 and that wolf numbers
tended to parallel moose numbers. However, after the wolf population in
his study area jumped 81 percent between 2000 and 2006 — from 44 animals
to 81 — moose numbers began declining.
“We
don’t know how far and wide that increase [in the wolf population] took
place, but it did in our study area, and that area was adjacent to the
moose study area,” Mech said. He said it’s reasonable to surmise the
wolf population in the rest of the moose study area also was rising,
rather than remaining stable, as it was elsewhere.
Moose
are a prime food source for wolves in the northeast, so as the moose
population declines, one would expect the wolf population to eventually
fall, too. “That seems to be happening in our study area,” Mech said.
The wolf population there increased until 2012, but he said it appears
to have since declined.
The DNR estimated the state’s wolf population last winter at 2,423, stable from 2013.
So if the wolf population in moose country is declining, will moose rebound?
“That
depends on what’s going on,” Mech said. “If it’s strictly wolves, the
moose population will recover. But if there are other factors involved —
parasites, disease or warming temperatures, then it’s hard to say.”
And
if wolves turn out to be a major factor, then the DNR will have to
decide whether to try to lower the population of one iconic animal to
try to boost the population of another.
No comments:
Post a Comment