Still Time to Submit Comments In Opposition To Harmful Mexican Wolf Rule: We’ve been keeping you updated here about a recent proposal from the Fish and Wildlife Service that will change the rules about how Mexican gray wolves
are managed in the wild. This proposed rule would ultimately allow more
wolves to be killed, and would keep them out of some of the best
remaining habitat. Last week, our members came out to testify against
this rule at the Service’s public hearings in Pinetop, AZ and Truth or
Consequences, NM. We had incredible success with pro-wolf supporters
outnumbering anti-wolf opponents 2-1 at both events! But even if you are
not a local Arizona or New Mexico resident, we still need your help
preventing this proposal from moving forward. We need you to submit comments
to the Service in opposition of this harmful rule change. Tell the
Service not to allow more killing, but instead do what it knows the
lobos need:
Complete and implement an updated recovery plan and management rules that are based on science, not politics
Release more breeding pairs into the wild
Establish at least two additional core populations in suitable habitat
All of your comments will go into the public record and will be
evaluated by the Service as it decides how to manage critically
endangered lobos.
Discussion over Montana’s Wolf Conservation Stamp Heats Up: Last week Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks (FWP) hosted an open forum for the public to comment on the agency’s new proposal which would establish a stamp to fund wolf conservation in Montana.
Defenders believes this stamp could offer a truly unique opportunity
for wolf conservationists to support non-lethal wolf programs in the
state. This sentiment was expressed by dozens of wolf advocates who
testified at the hearing in support of the stamp but with suggested
changes. This proposal is far from finalized… Anti-wolf folks also
showed up and made clear that they don’t want anyone but hunters,
anglers and trappers to have a stake in wildlife management in Montana.
They argued that a wolf conservation stamp would allow non-hunters and
wolf supporters to influence FWP’s agenda. But the truth is, wildlife is
a public trust and the entire public deserves a say in decisions made
by wildlife agencies. Currently, hunting and fishing dollars are the
main source of funding for FWP but this funding is declining. A wolf
stamp is an opportunity for FWP to raise funding from people who love
wildlife but may not want to pay for a hunting or fishing license.
Defenders
believes that if implemented correctly, this wolf stamp could be a
model for other states wrestling with declining revenues and a growing
non-hunting public. We’ve already submitted comments to FWP – and asked
you to do the same – asserting that we strongly support the proposal if
and only if ALL proceeds from the stamp go towards non-lethal wolf
conservation and that an accurate annual reporting of funds spent is
made available to the public. FWP needs to know that wolf supporters
will support this stamp, but only if all stamp proceeds fund non-lethal
wolf conservation in the state.Our View: What is a Coywolf? Recently there have been several articles in news outlets including the New York Times and Washington Post
using the term “coywolf” to talk about a hybrid wolf and coyote animal.
Some articles have even insinuated that this “coywolf” is a new
species! The bottom line? “Coywolf” is a term being sensationalized by
the media. From a scientific perspective, all these news stories are
describing interbreeding – something that has taken place for hundreds
of years. And the most scientifically accurate term to describe many
products of this interbreeding is “eastern coyote,” not “coywolf.”
Eastern coyotes inhabit many areas of the Northeast, Midwest, and
Southeast, have been breeding with wolves and dogs for years. This does
not make them a new species — they are just coyotes with a few wolf and
dog genes!
No comments:
Post a Comment