August 9, 2014
The Michigan Legislature could move as early as next week to pass a pro-hunting law designed to make moot two statewide referendums in November that would stop state-sanctioned wolf hunts. (Gary Kramer / AP)
Lansing — Michigan lawmakers on
Wednesday are expected to pass a law to keep intact the state’s power to
allow wolf hunts, overriding two referendums on the November ballot
backed by groups that oppose hunting the once-endangered animal.
The
pending move not only is sparking debate over whether a wolf hunt
should be held for the second straight year. It also is reviving
questions over the extent to which the Republican-controlled Legislature
should interfere with issues headed to a statewide vote.
In
May, legislators approved a minimum wage increase to head off a ballot
initiative that would have raised the hourly minimum more, particularly
for tipped employees. Election officials later ruled that proponents had
not collected enough valid petition signatures regardless.
In
December 2012, lawmakers passed a replacement for an emergency manager
law struck down by voters in a referendum a month before.
The
proposal before the Legislature now — initiated legislation backed by
various outdoor and hunting groups that gathered voter signatures — is
designed to make moot November referendums on two laws that cleared the
way for Michigan’s first wolf hunt in decades.
The
Natural Resources Commission scheduled the hunt under authority granted
by the Legislature last year. Opponents had gathered enough voter
signatures to require a referendum on a law approved in December 2012
that designated the gray wolf a game animal.
So
Gov. Rick Snyder signed a second law in May 2013 giving the commission
the authority to decide which animals should be designated as species
that can be hunted, prompting opponents to collect enough signatures
this year for a second referendum.
“It’s
enormously contemptuous of voters,” Jill Fritz, director of Keep
Michigan Wolves Protected, said of the Legislature’s expected approval
of the new legislation. “They don’t trust the voters to make the
decision on whether wolves should be a game species or not. They’ve
basically shown contempt for the intelligence of voters, the very voters
who by the way voted them into office.”
But
Sen. Tom Casperson, an Escanaba Republican who strongly supports the
initiated bill, said it was voter-initiated and a lot is at stake for
hunting in general — not just the wolf hunt that led 22 wolves to be
killed in the Upper Peninsula last November and December. The state had
authorized a take of 43.
The measure — like
one of the laws subject to referendum — would carry out the wishes of
voters who approved a 1996 ballot initiative giving the commission,
whose members are appointed by the governor and serve staggered terms,
authority to set hunting policy in Michigan based on scientific data,
Casperson said.
“The United State Humane
Society has an awful lot of money,” he said, warning that if the hunting
laws were repealed in November, the animal rights group could be
emboldened to challenge other hunting-related decisions by the state. “I
get concerned that they could pour enough money in with 30-second sound
bites … and I can’t say people would get the whole story.”
The
anti-wolf hunt ballot group has spent nearly $1.1 million on signature
gathering and other expenses. The pro-hunting ballot committee has spent
more than $700,000.
Pro-hunting and farm
groups contend the opposition to wolf hunting is fueled by out-of-state
animal rights groups that want to ban all hunting. Opponents acknowledge
receiving support from elsewhere but insist their movement is
home-grown.
In recent days, there have been
reports that five hunting dogs and a cow died after three separate wolf
attacks in the U.P. Foes of wolf hunting say farmers and government
officials already have the right to kill problem wolves without needing
an annual state-endorsed hunt.
The Board of
State Canvassers certified the initiative petition on July 24. The
Legislature has until Sept. 2 to vote or it will be placed on the
November ballot alongside the referendums, according to the nonpartisan
House Fiscal Agency.
The Senate’s only
session day before the deadline is Wednesday. The House meets Wednesday
and Aug. 27. Because the bill is a citizens’ initiative, it would not
need Snyder’s signature.
The measure would
allocate $1 million for “rapid response” activities against aquatic
invasive species such as Asian carp. The appropriation would make the
legislation immune from being overturned in a referendum.
Keep Michigan Wolves Protected is not ruling out legal action if the Legislature approves the bill, Fritz said.
No comments:
Post a Comment