Posted:
07/02/2013
Until
recently the restoration of the gray wolf to a portion of its natural
habitat in the lower 48 was one of the success stories of the Endangered
Species Act of 1973. However, the job is far from complete, and now the
U.S. Department of the Interior wants to allow the states to return to
many of the same methods of the late 1800s and early 1900s that led to
the eradication of the wolf in California and elsewhere.
be dropped, not because it has recovered across most of its former range, but because the Department of the Interior appears to be responding to political pressure rather than peer reviewed science.Elk hunting groups mistakenly see the wolf as competition for their sport. This represents a grave misunderstanding of the ecology of predator-prey relationships.
Many livestock producers have not begun to explore the non-lethal methods proven to reduce conflict between wolves and livestock. Even though livestock losses to wolves accounted for less than .01 percent of the total livestock in Idaho, Wyoming and Montana in 2012, many sheep and cattle ranchers want to see the wolf eradicated.
If the gray wolf is delisted, then
management of wolf populations reverts to each state. Wolves were delisted in 2011 in Idaho and Montana, and 2012 in Wyoming. Management in these states is a cruel euphemism for indiscriminate, aggressive hunting, trapping and snaring of wolves. Since delisting in Idaho, nearly 700 wolves have been killed by recreational hunting. In some areas of Idaho, wolves, including lactating females and pups, can be killed at any time. In 83 percent of Wyoming, wolves can be killed year round, in any number of ways, without a license. And Montana's proposed management plan will allow up to five wolves to be killed per hunter/trapper. This is not scientific stewardship.
The now famous lone wolf OR-7 traveled
from Oregon into California in December 2011 but wandered back into
Oregon in March of this year. It defies logic to declare the gray wolf
population recovered in California. The same is true in other states
with excellent wolf habitat and abundant elk and deer such as Utah and
Colorado. Like California, these states have no established wolf
populations, yet there would be no federal protection for a wolf should
it wander in. This action will end recovery in these states before it
starts. Why delist the gray wolf in states where it does not yet exist,
unless the goal is to keep the population at zero?
The bald eagle was delisted in 2007, but we have not allowed open hunting and trapping. Why should we do that with wolves? The stated goal of the Endangered Species Act is to save species from extinction and to fully recover the species by removing threats to its survival.
The 90-day public comment period for the proposed gray wolf delisting ends Sept. 11. Newly confirmed Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell needs to hear from the public that wolf recovery has not even begun in California and other states. Wolves need our voices. Please howl your support for federal protection of the gray wolf until recovery is complete, and stop the wolf hunt.
The bald eagle was delisted in 2007, but we have not allowed open hunting and trapping. Why should we do that with wolves? The stated goal of the Endangered Species Act is to save species from extinction and to fully recover the species by removing threats to its survival.
The 90-day public comment period for the proposed gray wolf delisting ends Sept. 11. Newly confirmed Secretary of the Interior Sally Jewell needs to hear from the public that wolf recovery has not even begun in California and other states. Wolves need our voices. Please howl your support for federal protection of the gray wolf until recovery is complete, and stop the wolf hunt.
Winston Thomas, a biologist and
geneticist who has worked in the Bay Area biotech industry for 22 years,
is Pacific Region representative and an advisory board member of Living
with Wolves (www.livingwithwolves.org). He wrote this for this newspaper.
No comments:
Post a Comment